 |
| Anders Fogh Rasmussen |
Nov 11, 2023. Posted by Balkan Periscope - Hellas
Anders Fogh Rasmussen has long worked alongside Andriy Yermak, an adviser to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, particularly ahead of the last Nato summit in Vilnius this year that ended with no invitation for Ukraine to join.
The two men
are again broadly discussing Ukraine’s place in a new European security
architecture, including practical questions around the extent of Ukraine’s Nato
membership.
Rasmussen,
who was Nato’s secretary general between 2009 and 2014, insisted that a plan
for partial Ukraine membership would not symbolise a freezing of the conflict,
but would instead mark a determination to warn Russia that it cannot prevent
Ukraine joining the western defensive alliance.
Nato is due
to hold its 75th anniversary summit in Washington next summer, and the issue of
Ukraine’s future membership is bound to be a major topic.
Ukraine’s
leadership was left bitterly disappointed when, under US and German pressure,
Nato at its summit this year issued a statement saying Ukraine would be offered
an invitation when conditions allowed, effectively rejecting Ukraine’s request
to be given a specific date.
Instead,
Ukraine’s relationship with Nato was elevated on the margins by setting up a
Ukraine-Nato council and through an agreement that Nato members bilaterally
would offer security guarantees to Ukraine.
Rasmussen
said the cause of Ukraine’s Nato membership cannot be deferred again next year.
He said: “The time has come to take the next step and extend an invitation for
Ukraine to join Nato. We need a new European security architecture in which
Ukraine is in the heart of Nato.”
Those
advocating for Ukraine’s Nato membership have been hamstrung by the
near-impossibility of a country at war being offered membership, since under
Nato’s article 5 clause of collective self-defence, all Nato member states are
required to come to the active defence of the country in conflict. Nato
membership for all of Ukraine now would in effect be a notice to Russia by Nato
that it was about to go to war with Moscow.
By
excluding from Nato territory held by Russia, the threat of a Russia-Nato
conflict would be reduced, Rasmussen argues.
Rasmussen
denied the move would freeze the conflict, ceding Ukrainian territory to
Russia. He said: “The absolute credibility of article 5 guarantees would deter
Russia from mounting attacks inside the Ukrainian territory inside Nato and so
free up Ukrainian forces to go to the frontline.”
He said:
“To make article 5 credible there would have to be a clear message to Russia
that any violation of Nato territory would be met by a response.” He said in
some ways the proposal is similar to imposing a no-fly zone on Russia so that
it could not fly over Ukrainian territory or send missiles into Ukrainian
towns.
Privacy
Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content
funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use
Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms
of Service apply.
after
newsletter promotion
Discussions
are under way to enlist military specialists ahead of the next Nato summit to
work through the details of their idea, including how in the context of
shifting frontlines a credible demarcation line could be drawn, showing
Ukrainian territory deemed inside Nato and territory occupied by Russia.
Rasmussen
said an imprecise precedent existed since west Germany joined the alliance in
1955, and article 5 covered its territory but not that of east Germany.
He set out
three principal reasons for Ukraine to be offered membership. Ukraine inside
Nato would act as a bulwark against a still-aggressive Russia. Second, he said:
“We have to realise that grey zones are danger zones. Neutrality in the old
sense of the world does not exist any more. Grey zones become a temptation for
Putin to attack.” Finally, he argued the Ukrainian army is now the most battle
hardened army in Europe and would be an asset and example to other European
powers.
He said a
total of 25 countries in addition to the countries inside the G7 were
negotiating bilateral security agreements with Ukraine as part of an umbrella
agreement called the Kyiv security compact that is supposed to act as a bridge
to full Nato membership. The compact includes large-scale weapons transfers,
enhanced intelligence sharing and support to Ukraine’s defence industry so that
it can more independently produce weapons and ammunition.
The Guardian
--